A joint lawsuit brought by the parents of two Saugus High School students killed in a November 4, 2019, on-campus shooting will proceed to trial, according to the ruling issued by the Los Angeles Superior Court. Trial will likely begin in January 2024. The parents of Gracie Muehlberger and Dominic Blackwell allege that the Hart Union High School District had no program in place to identify and intervene with troubled students and, as a result, missed numerous red flags associated with the suicidal student who committed the murders. They also allege the District did not adequately supervise or secure the school campus.

The District had argued that it had no duty to protect the students and that the shooting was unforeseeable, both arguments rejected by the Court. The Court held that the general awareness of potential campus gun violence and need for safety protocols is the baseline foundation for the District’s specific duty to enact protections for student-on-student gun violence. It further held that the District’s argument that it could deny that ongoing threat unless and until a shooting occurred “myopically” limited the debate over campus safety requirements and “obtusely” denied an ongoing well-documented concern. The Court further recognized the vast difference between the resources required to help a single student in distress versus the outlays required to increase overall campus security.

“The District ignored numerous warning signs in the days and months before the shooting, including an assailant with a history of family abuse whose friends had become concerned over obvious signs of his distress just days before the shooting. Those concerns went unreported, and the District’s advertised student text to tip hotline was not working at the time of the shooting.” Julie Fieber, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP.

“The Judge has made clear that a school district cannot turn a blind eye to the risks of potential violence from troubled teenagers and inadequate campus supervision and security. It will now be a jury’s job to determine if the Hart Union High School District failed in its duty to protect the students whose lives were tragically lost in this foreseeable shooting by a suicidal student who was able to carry a gun onto campus through an unmonitored gate. We believe the jury will find that the school simply failed in its duty to ensure that personnel were watching over the campus and students that day.” Julie Fieber, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP.

Related Materials

Signal Contact Us

Type the following characters: niner, foxtrot, papa, tango, whisky, six
Jump to Page

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek