Brian Danitz is a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP. Brian has substantial experience representing clients in state and federal litigation, arbitration, internal investigations, and government investigations, involving commercial disputes, corporate and securities fraud, shareholder litigation, consumer class actions, antitrust actions, and employee whistleblower complaints. His practice includes all aspects of civil litigation in state and federal courts, in matters involving complex issues including allegations of securities law violations, shareholder disputes including involving breach of fiduciary duty and corporate governance, trade secret violations, and commercial disputes.
Brian is actively involved in the California and Bay Area legal communities, and currently serves as a member of the State Bar of California’s 2021 Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.
Prior to joining CPM, Brian worked at a large law firm in Silicon Valley, representing clients in commercial litigation, securities litigation, and government enforcement matters.
Prior to becoming a lawyer, Brian was a documentary filmmaker and producer of new media. Brian was the cinematographer for the Oscar-winning documentary Bowling for Columbine, Oscar-nominated film Sound and Fury, and Emmy Award winner TV Nation, and directed Ecological Design: Inventing the Future, Objects and Memory, and N is for Nuclear, among other films.
Brian received his J.D. from Fordham University School of Law, cum laude, where he was the Symposium Editor of the Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal. Brian received B.F.A. and M.P.S. degrees from New York University.
In re Apple Inc. Device Performance Litigation, co-lead counsel for putative class of iPhone6, SE and 7 owners involving computer intrusion and trespass claims related to the alleged throttling of device performance. On May 15, 2020, the District Court preliminarily approved a potential $500 million class settlement in this multidistrict litigation.
Wozniak, et al. v. YouTube, et al., represent tech pioneer Steve Wozniak and seventeen victims of a fraudulent Bitcoin Giveaway scam in a lawsuit against YouTube and Google currently pending in Santa Clara County Superior Court.
Chang v. Beam Financial Inc., counsel for putative class of users of Beam Financial’s mobile banking app in a consumer action against the Fin-Tech company. As alleged, Beam represented that it was a secure banking app and specifically promised users high interest rates, no lockup and “24/7 access" to their accounts; contrary to these promises, members have been unable to withdraw their money and have not received the promised interest. The case is currently pending in the Northern District of California.
In re Slack Technologies, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, co-lead counsel for putative class of investors who bought stock in the initial public offering of Slack, a San Francisco-based technology company that offers a cloud-based productivity platform, alleging that that the registration statement and prospectus contained misleading information about the company’s condition. The case is currently pending in San Mateo County Superior Court.
In re Facebook Inc. Shareholder Derivative Privacy Litigation, lead counsel in derivative litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary in connection with the Cambridge Analytica data breach, currently pending in the Northern District of California.
Morgus v. Page, et al., represent shareholder in derivative litigation regarding alleged breaches of fiduciary in connection with the approval of payments to executives accused of sexual harassment and other misconduct, currently pending in Santa Clara County Superior Court.
Tribble v. Gerrans, et al., plaintiffs’ counsel in shareholder derivative action on behalf of biomedical device company Sanovas, Inc., alleging that the former CEO stole company funds and was able to do so because the company lacked meaningful internal controls. After issuing temporary restraining orders against the defendants, the Marin County Superior Court entered a stipulated judgment establishing significant governance reforms, including the addition of independent directors, an audit committee, board observer rights, required board meetings and annual shareholder meetings to elect directors. The former CEO was tried and found guilty on multiple criminal counts in federal court.
John’s Grill v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al., plaintiffs’ counsel for iconic San Francisco restaurant John’s Grill and other businesses in a series of cases alleging bad faith refusal to provide insurance coverage for business interruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and related civil authority shutdown orders.
Morning Star Fisheries, et al. v. San Mateo County Harbor District, lead trial counsel representing San Mateo County Harbor District in a series of commercial disputes with fisheries located at Johnson Pier in El Granada, California. After an eleven day hearing, the Arbitrator ruled in favor of the District on all claims and ordered the fisheries to pay the District over $500,000 in attorney fees and costs for defending the lawsuits.
Rubin v. Peters, et al., represent plaintiff in litigation alleging legal malpractice and fraud in connection with a prenuptial agreement in San Mateo County Superior Court. The case settled on favorable terms after the court unsealed the complaint and denied defendants’ demurrers to nearly all counts in the complaint.
Nuts for Candy v. Visa, Inc., et al., plaintiffs’ counsel for putative class of California merchants involving claims that merchants paid excessive fees to accept Visa payment cards because Visa violated the antitrust laws. The case resolved in conjunction with the $5.54 billion class settlement in the multi-district litigation In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation.
JD Brothers LLC et al. v. Liberty Asset Management Corporation et al., plaintiffs’ counsel in a case involving a real estate Ponzi-scheme involving multiple shell companies and multiple transactions. The case settled after jury selection and the district court eventually entered stipulated judgments totaling $10 million in favor of plaintiffs.
City of San Jose v. Donald J. Trump et al., counsel for the City of San Jose in a case seeking to stop the rescission of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (“DACA”) program, which shields hundreds of thousands of young immigrants from deportation. On June 18, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 majority opinion vacating rescission of the program.
- CNBC, 07.16.2021
- NBC Los Angeles, 06.03.2021
- KGO 810, 06.02.2021
- San Jose Mercury News, 06.02.2021
- Federal Court Issues Preliminary Injunction Against Bank of America, Protects Rights of California's Unemployed06.01.2021
- Los Angeles Times, 06.01.2021
- CBS SF Bay Area, 06.01.2021
- KPIX, 05.18.2021
- NBC Bay Area, 05.07.2021
- San Francisco Chronicle, 05.06.2021
- Lawsuit Seeks to Stop Google from Secretly Selling Americans' Private Information Without Informed Consent05.05.2021
- San Francisco Chronicle, 04.03.2021
- ABC10, 02.22.2021
- San Francisco Chronicle, 01.26.2021
- San Jose Mercury News, 01.15.2021
- CalMatters, 01.15.2021
- CBS SF Bay Area, 01.15.2021
- ABC 7 News, 01.15.2021
- CNBC, 11.27.2020
- Law360, 11.13.2020
- Aided by CPM, the Historic Cliff House San Francisco Restaurant Sues Allianz Insurance and Affiliates07.29.2020
- CPM Helps Steve Wozniak and 17 Fraud Victims Sue YouTube and Google Over Fraudulent "Bitcoin Giveaway" Scam07.22.2020
- CPM Fights for Rights of Estranged Wife of Android Creator Andy Rubin; Court Documents Show How Google Paid Off After He Was Accused of Sexual MisconductBuzzFeed.News, 07.02.2019
- As CPM Represents Victimized Estranged Wife, Ex-Google Star Rubin Spars to Keep Divorce Fallout SecretBloomberg, 04.25.2019
- San Mateo Daily Journal, 06.20.2018
- With CPM Pro Bono Representation, Federal Judge Protects “Dreamers,” Issues Injunction Against Trump Administration2018
- Update: City of Richmond (CPM Client) v. Trump; limiting the scope of prior executive order threatening to defund sanctuary jurisdictions05.22.2017
- Sierra Club, 04.01.2017
- Daily Journal, 12.15.2020
- Daily Journal, 08.02.2018
- Practising Law Institute, Securities Litigation and Enforcement Institute, 2010
- Practising Law Institute, Securities Litigation and Enforcement Institute, 2009
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, 2005
- 14 Widener Law Journal 907, 2005
- Advocates for Justice, 03.26.2018
- Advocates for Justice, 03.20.2017
Fordham University School of Law, J.D. (2006)
- Cum Laude
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal, Symposium Editor
New York University, Interactive Telecommunications Program, M.P.S. (2000)
- Pioneering Artist in New Media Award
New York University, Tisch School of the Arts, Bachelor of Fine Arts
- State Bar of California
- State Bar of New York
- State Bar of Washington
- United States Supreme Court
- Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
- Northern District of California
- Central District of California
- Eastern District of California
- Southern District of California
- Southern District of New York
- Eastern District of New York