The United States District Court in the Northern District of California granted final approval of a groundbreaking settlement agreement on behalf of a nationwide class action of Zoom users and subscribers.  The action alleged that Zoom failed to provide end-to-end encryption of Zoom meetings, improperly shared user information, and left many exposed to “Zoombombing” by unauthorized third parties.   

Last year, the Court ruled on Zoom’s motion to dismiss, addressing several novel issues raised by the case, including application of Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act and alleged violation of privacy and unfair competition laws in California, where Zoom is based.  The Court allowed several claims in the litigation to move forward.  After intensive discovery, the parties then negotiated the settlement by which Zoom will pay $85 million in cash compensation and implement comprehensive reforms to its business practices. 

Tina Wolfson of Ahdoot & Wolfson and Mark Molumphy of Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, the Co-Lead Counsel representing Zoom subscribers and users, noted that final approval will allow class members to immediately receive the benefits of the Settlement relief.

Mark Molumphy, a partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP said:

“Millions of Americans continue to use Zoom’s platform with the expectation that their conversations will be kept private and secure.  This groundbreaking settlement will provide a substantial cash recovery to Zoom users and implement privacy practices that, going forward, will help ensure that users are safe and protected.”

Tina Wolfson, a partner at Ahdoot Wolfson said:

“In the age of corporate surveillance, this historic settlement recognizes that data is the new oil and compensates consumers for unwittingly providing data in exchange for a “free” service.  It also compensates those who paid for a product they did not receive and commits Zoom to changing its corporate behavior to better inform consumers about their privacy choices and provide stronger cybersecurity.”

The case is In re Zoom Video Communications, inc. Privacy Litigation, Case No. 5:20-cv-02155-LB (N.D.Cal).

Related Materials

Signal Contact Us

Type the following characters: whisky, romeo, foxtrot, six
Jump to Page

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek