A Los Angeles Superior Court Judge recently handed down a Decision on a long running animal abuse trial.  The case stems from online puppy trafficking by a California family that sold sick Goldendoodle puppies to unsuspecting families.  The breed, health and gender of the puppies were misrepresented.  Families paid more than $1,000 cash per puppy.  When the dogs became ill and the families contacted the sellers, they were harassed.  In some cases, the dogs had been dyed, so that their reddish brown color washed out in the bath, revealing a white puppy.

After a week-long bench trial, the Court issued an injunction against Defendants, preventing them from ever again advertising or selling dogs.  The Court noted in its Decision “…it is apparent that Defendants have no intention of stopping their illegal sales of puppies…A strong deterrent is clearly called for in this case.”

The Court awarded damages for the cost of the dogs, their treatment and for emotional distress to the families, noting “The Defendants’ scheme is especially heinous due to the physical suffering of the puppies and the resulting emotional toll their illnesses and deaths took on innocent families”.  After making a finding of malice, oppression and fraud, the Court held a Phase Two trial, and ultimately imposed $100,000.00 in punitive damages. 

Gary Praglin, a Partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy said,

"This is a victory for animal rights.  These families and their puppies suffered terribly.  This Decision  protects people and animals.  Awarding emotional distress damages for animal abuse recognizes puppies as family.”                            

Theresa Vitale, an attorney at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy said,

“The Plaintiffs, who were harassed and intimidated by Defendants after spending weeks trying to save their sick and dying puppies, are grateful that justice has prevailed in this case and that Defendants can never again harm innocent puppies or families with their false advertising scheme.”

The Plaintiffs were represented by Gary Praglin and Theresa Vitale of Cotchett, Pitre & Mcarthy.  Plaintiff CARU was represented by Christopher Berry and Asha Brundage-Moore of Animal Legal Defense Fund. 

The case name is Jessica Loy v. Trina Kenney, et. al 19STCV45035.

Signal Contact Us

Type the following characters: tango, foxtrot, whisky, six, papa, tango
Jump to Page

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek