Advocates for Justice

  • Healthcare Schemers Cannot Hide Behind the First-to-File Doctrine 

    With a greater demand to access for healthcare services also comes the need for reliable and honest physicians and healthcare facilities. Unfortunately, throughout the country healthcare kickback schemes are becoming more prominent in the healthcare system.

    Kickbacks are incentives, usually bribes or anything of value, paid to a physician or healthcare facility to induce the referral of items or services reimbursable by Medicare, Medi-Cal or private insurers. Now more than ever, whistleblowers are encouraged to exercise their duty and right to disclose fraudulent or wrongful conduct.

    As a result, Defendants are using the First-to-File Doctrine to discourage whistleblowers from coming forward on fraudulent kickback schemes. The First-to-File Doctrine “bars later-filed actions alleging the same material elements of fraud described in an earlier suit, regardless of whether the allegations incorporate somewhat different details.” United States ex rel. Lujan v. Hughes Aircraft Co. (9th Cir. 2001) 243 F.3d 1181, 1188-89. Defendants argue that prior investigations and lawsuits involving similar situations bar kickback actions, under three provisions of the Federal and California False Claims Acts.

    However, the rule does not bar suits alleging “related but distinct fraud claims.” U.S. ex rel. Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 792 F.3d 1121, 1131 (9th Cir. 2015). Similarity is assessed by comparing the complaints side-by-side and asking whether the later complaint “alleges a fraudulent scheme the government already would be equipped to investigate based on [the first] [c]omplaint.” United States ex rel. Batiste v. SLM Corp., 659 F.3d 1204, 1209 (D.C. Cir.2011). Many times, Defendants fail to meet the “same material elements” test.

    Every claim made for services tainted by these illegal kickbacks is a violation of Federal and California False Claims Acts. The False Claims Act allows a whistleblower to work with government agencies to help investigate the fraud and hold the schemers accountable. By filing a False Claims Act case with Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, you can help the government fight this fraud, and if successful, share a percentage of the amount rewarded.

    If you have information regarding fraud or would like more information, please contact CPM attorney Carlos Urzua.

    • Carlos  Urzua
      Senior Associate

      Carlos Urzua is a senior associate at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP's Santa Monica office. His areas of practice include products liability, mass torts, professional negligence, wrongful death, and environmental tort, all on ...

Topics

Archives

Jump to Page

Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek