- Posts by Emanuel B. TownsendSenior Associate
Emanuel B. Townsend is a Senior Associate at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP where he represents whistleblowers in qui tam actions in both state and federal court, victims of complex financial fraud, employees who have been ...
Defendants often cite Carter v. Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley LLC (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 396 in support of their argument that the plaintiff’s complaint pleads a cause of action for professional negligence rather than elder abuse. Defendants often argue that Carter, in effect, altered the law and heightened the pleading requirements for an elder abuse cause of action. In making this argument, however, defendants misinterpret the Carter holding. The Carter court did not modify the elements or the pleading requirements for elder abuse under California’s Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act. In fact, the Carter court stated that it “distill[s]” the requirements of an elder abuse case. The Carter decision did not, however, increase or enhance Plaintiff’s pleading requirements. Id. at 406.Read More ›
In federal and California state courts, defendants often look to the “public disclosure bar,” 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(4)(A) and Cal. Gov. Code section 12652, subd. (d)(3)(A), to shield them from liability from claims brought under the Federal and California False Claims Acts. Not surprisingly, defendants routinely argue that the public disclosure bar should be broadly construed to bar claims that are only tangentially related to information publicly disclosed before the whistleblower (also called the “relator”) filed their false claims action.Read More ›