- Criminal Judge Asks Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy to Weigh in on PG&E's Safety Record
- Defrauded Investors May Lose Their Right to Recovery: Trump Administration Pushes for Regulatory Changes that Would Allow Companies to Avoid Securities Class Actions Through the Use of Mandatory Arbitration Agreements
- Finra Enacts Important Rule to Protect Seniors Against Fraudulent Activity
- The CPFB Remains Under Attack: Consumers Should Care About an Agency that has Recovered More than $11.9 Billion for Everyday Workers
- Supreme Court Upholds Right to Bring Securities Act Class Actions in State Court
- Cracking Down on the “Rehab Riviera”
- Protecting Our Seniors—Stating a Cause of Action for Elder Abuse is Not as Difficult as Defendants Often Claim
- “Smart” toys raise privacy and safety concerns for kids
- Strict new privacy and data protections soon take effect in European countries
- Is your cell phone tracking every move you make?
CPFB Wins Trial on Behalf of Consumers Mislead by Loan Servicer
From time to time we have posted information about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) because it is an extraordinary agency fighting in the trenches for everyday consumers against big business, including financial institutions that are scamming Americans. On Friday September 8, 2017 the CFPB won a trial in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California before Judge Richard Seeborg. The CFPB won $7.9 million in its case against Nationwide Biweekly Administration Inc. and its subsidiary, Loan Payment Administration, and its owner, Daniel Lipsk. The CFPB presented testimony by experts as well as everyday consumers, including a retired schoolteacher and a member of the armed services and an FBI agent (all who testified that they had personally been tricked by the defendants).
In finding against the Defendants, the Court considered whether a “reasonable consumer” would be misled by the defendant mortgage loan servicer’s tactics and concluded that he or she would likely be misled. The Court concluded that consumers would be likely to misunderstand the promises that were made regarding savings to be had and would be misled and deceived regarding the relationship between the defendants and the consumer’s lenders.
The case is notable – not only because of the $7.9 million dollar recovery – but because it demonstrates that the CFPB is willing to take cases to trial in order to fulfill its mission, which is to “make consumer financial markets work for consumers, responsible providers, and the economy as a whole.” It is further the mission of the CFPB to “protect consumers from unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices and take action against companies that break the law.” See, https://www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/the-bureau/.
Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP has a long track record of representing consumers, small businesses, employees and whistleblowers who have been the victim of financial fraud, including in consumer class actions. For more information contact our firm at (650) 697-6000. The author of this article can be reached at email@example.com.