Commercial Litigation

CPM has decades of experience and a proven track record of success in commercial litigation.  CPM understands the need to litigate cases in a cost-effective manner.  Years of experience, a well thought out strategy and strong execution of that strategy allows CPM to achieve excellent results for its clients without excessive costs.

RECENT CASES OF NOTE

Exigen v. Genesys Telecommunications
San Mateo County Superior Court
CPM represents several U.S. and foreign-based companies in an action for misappropriation of trade secrets and defamation.  

Backhouse Litigation
Santa Clara County Superior Court
CPM represents over 20 trusts who were the victims of a $17 million misappropriation scheme. 

Phelps v. Van Dyk Mortgage Corporation
Santa Clara County Superior Court
CPM represents two investors who were victims of a $700,000 misappropriation scheme. 

Lorenzo Salhi, et al. v. PNY Technologies, Inc., et al.
Superior Court of California, San Mateo County
CPM represents Lorenzo Salhi and his Bay Area start-up company Silicon Valley Solutions in an action against the multi-national corporation PNY Technologies and certain of its executives.  The complaint alleges that defendants misrepresented critical information during negotiations then breached their agreements with plaintiffs before wrongfully terminating Lorenzo Salhi.  

IN Re: HSBC Bank USA, N.A., Debit Card Overdraft Fee Litigation
USDC, Eastern District of New York
CPM is Co-Lead Counsel in a putative class action against HSBC for breach of contract and deceptive business practices based upon the bank's charging of overdraft fees.

Humboldt Creamery Litigation
Humboldt County Superior Court
CPM is representing the Liquidating Trustee of Humboldt Creamery, LLC in a lawsuit filed against the company’s former Chief Executive Officer, its Chief Financial Officer, and its independent auditor alleging financial fraud and negligence in the management of Humboldt Creamery. 

Universal Paragon Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
Northern District of California  
CPM represented a property developer in litigation relating to a decades-long dispute over DNAPL (Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid) contamination caused by solvents from a lock factory owned by the Schlage Lock Company, before it was acquired  by Ingersoll-Rand.  The Visitacion Valley property, which was the subject of the litigation, is some of the most valuable and underdeveloped property in the Bay Area but the contamination and litigation prevented any serious effort to develop this property.  CPM’s aggressive litigation strategy resulted in a successful resolution of the litigation, creating an opportunity to develop Visitacion Valley into a commercial center in the Bay Area.  The California Court of Appeal described CPM as an “experienced litigation firm that obtained a ‘stupendous’ result for the [client].”

Siller v. Siller Brothers, Inc.
Sutter Superior Court
The firm successfully represented a minority shareholder in a dissolution proceeding and trial establishing a value for his corporate interest at more than double that of the court appointed appraisers.

Tax Shelter Cases
CPM successfully represented a number of tax payers who were induced into investing in different tax strategies based upon representations by tax professionals like BDO Seidman, KPMG and Ernst & Young, that the investments were legitimate.  In fact, the investments were illegal tax shelters and the tax payers had to pay back taxes, penalties and interest.  

Olympus v. Taisei Construction
Santa Clara Superior Court
The firm successfully represented the owner of the prestigious Calistoga Ranch Resort in an action for fraudulent overbilling against Taisei Construction.

Montana Power
CPM successfully represented a bankruptcy against Goldman Sachs and Millbank Tweed arising out of the collapse of Montana Power Company.  

Key Contacts