Practice areas:
Antitrust
Aviation
Business & Commercial
Construction
Consumer Fraud
Elder Abuse
Employment / Wage and Hour
Environmental and Toxic
First Amendment
Injury and Wrongful Death
Insurance
Intellectual Property
Product Liability
Qui Tam
Securities
 

The cases below are simply examples of the hundreds of types of litigations the firm has handled over the past 30-plus years.

Examples of First Amendment Litigation

Sharper Image Corporation v. Consumers Union of United States, 03-4094 (N.D. Cal.)
Successful defense under California’s Anti-SLAPP statute of product disparagement claim brought by Sharper Image relating to reviews of Sharper Image’s Ionic Breeze air cleaner published in Consumer Reports.

Isuzu Motors Ltd. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.
C.D. Cal. No. 97 5685 RAP
Represented defendant publisher of Consumer Reports in defamation/product disparagement litigation brought by auto manufacturer against non-profit consumer testing organization. Jury verdict for Consumers Union after a two-month jury trial.

Suzuki Motor Corp. Japan v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.
C.D. Cal. No. SA CV 96-340 AHS
Represented defendant publisher of Consumer Reports in defamation/product disparagement litigation brought by auto manufacturer against nonprofit consumer testing organization. Summary judgment in favor of defendants was granted in May, 2000.

In re Cable News Network and Time Magazine "Operation Tailwind" Litigation
MDL No. 1257
Sheppard v. Cable News Network, Inc.
Case No. C-98 20946 JF (ND Cal.)
Action against Time and CNN on behalf of Vietnam veterans falsely reported to have committed war crimes in Laos.

 


This web site contains attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The choice of a law firm is extremely important and should not be based on advertisements. A potential client should look at the prior history of our firm and its role in society and the community, and our commitment to the cases we take. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of our firm. This site contains general information and not legal advice.